BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//wp-events-plugin.com//7.2.3.1//EN
TZID:Europe/Paris
X-WR-TIMEZONE:Europe/Paris
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:8544@i2m.univ-amu.fr
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20250310T140000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20250310T150000
DTSTAMP:20250307T100714Z
URL:https://www.i2m.univ-amu.fr/evenements/seminaire-de-thomas-schatz-2/
SUMMARY:Thomas Schatz (AMU): Séminaire de Thomas Schatz
DESCRIPTION:Thomas Schatz: Title\n\nUnbiased Estimation from Unbalanced Hie
 rarchical Samples\, with Applications to the Evaluation of Representation 
 Learning Algorithms\n\nAbstract\n\nClassical U-statistics' theory generali
 ze statistical estimation theory from averages of functions of one i.i.d. 
 sample (for example the Euclidean norm is a function of one sample\, if sa
 mples are real vectors) to averages of function of several i.i.d. samples 
 (for example\, the Euclidean distance is a function of two samples if samp
 les are real vectors). It notably provides Uniformly Minimum Variance Unbi
 ased Estimators (UMVUEs) for many statistical models of practical relevanc
 e. But what happens if we are not working with simple i.i.d. samples?\n\nI
 n this talk\, motivated by applications to representational geometry analy
 sis in machine learning and cognitive (neuro)science [1-6]\, we will consi
 der the case of possibly heavily unbalanced hierarchical samples. We will 
 start with the non-trivial issue of defining hierarchical samples with eno
 ugh generality to cover the application cases of interest. We will then se
 e that i.i.d. samples can be represented as graphs with the special proper
 ty that all graph isomorphisms are also graph automorphisms and that the s
 implicity of the classical theory depends on this property. In the case of
  unbalanced hierarchical samples\, this property no longer holds and we wi
 ll discuss what are the proper ways to generalize and what can be salvaged
  of the classical theory in this case. We will conclude with some computat
 ional considerations.\n\nReferences\n\n[1] Aarre Laakso and Garrison Cottr
 ell. “Content and cluster analysis: assessing representational similarit
 y in neural systems”. Philosophical psychology 13.1 (2000)\, pp. 47–76
 .\n\n[2] James V Haxby\, M Ida Gobbini\, Maura L Furey\, Alumit Ishai\, Je
 nnifer L Schouten\, and Pietro Pietrini. “Distributed and overlapping re
 presentations of faces and objects in ventral temporal cortex”. Science 
 293.5539 (2001)\, pp. 2425–2430.\n\n[3] Nikolaus Kriegeskorte\, Marieke 
 Mur\, and Peter A Bandettini. “Representational similarity analysis-conn
 ecting the branches of systems neuroscience”. Frontiers in systems neuro
 science 2 (2008)\, p. 249.\n[4] Thomas Schatz\, Vijayaditya Peddinti\, Fra
 ncis Bach\, Aren Jansen\, Hynek Hermansky and Emmanuel Dupoux. “Evaluati
 ng speech features with the minimal-pair ABX task: Analysis of the classic
 al MFC/PLP pipeline”. Proceeding of INTERSPEECH 2013.\n&nbsp\;\n\n[5] Co
 rinna Cortes\, Mehryar Mohri\, and Afshin Rostamizadeh. “Algorithms for 
 learning kernels based on centered alignment”. The Journal of Machine Le
 arning Research 13 (2012)\, pp. 795–828.\n\n[6] Simon Kornblith\, Mohamm
 ad Norouzi\, Honglak Lee\, and Geoffrey Hinton. “Similarity of Neural Ne
 twork Representations Revisited”. Proceedings of ICML 2019.
CATEGORIES:Séminaire,Statistique
LOCATION:I2M Saint-Charles - Salle séminaire\, Aix-Marseille Université I
 nstitut de Mathématiques de Marseille (I2M) - UMR 7373 \, 3 place Victor 
 Hugo Case 19\, Marseille Cedex 3\, 13331\, France
X-APPLE-STRUCTURED-LOCATION;VALUE=URI;X-ADDRESS=Aix-Marseille Université I
 nstitut de Mathématiques de Marseille (I2M) - UMR 7373 \, 3 place Victor 
 Hugo Case 19\, Marseille Cedex 3\, 13331\, France;X-APPLE-RADIUS=100;X-TIT
 LE=I2M Saint-Charles - Salle séminaire:geo:0,0
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Paris
X-LIC-LOCATION:Europe/Paris
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20241027T020000
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
END:VCALENDAR