BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//wp-events-plugin.com//7.2.3.1//EN
TZID:Europe/Paris
X-WR-TIMEZONE:Europe/Paris
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:5851@i2m.univ-amu.fr
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20221201T160000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20221201T170000
DTSTAMP:20241120T200234Z
URL:https://www.i2m.univ-amu.fr/evenements/the-effect-of-body-size-and-tem
 perature-on-flight-metabolic-rate-and-wing-kinematics-in-bees/
SUMMARY:Jon Harrison / Meghan Duell / Jordan Glass (Arizona State Universit
 y\, Tempe\, USA): The effect of body size and temperature on flight metabo
 lic rate and wing kinematics in bees
DESCRIPTION:Jon Harrison / Meghan Duell / Jordan Glass: Body size and tempe
 rature are two dominant variables affecting animal flight performance and 
 energetics\, yet many basic questions remain about patterns and causes.\nA
 mong flying birds and larger insects (and runners)\, mechanical power outp
 ut and energetic expenditure appear to show similar patterns with body mas
 s\, with power output scaling approximately isometrically (proportional to
  mass1)\, and metabolic rates scaling hypometrically (proportional to mass
 &lt\;1). This pattern may be due to lower frequencies of movement in large
 r species\, and resultant lower costs of calcium cycling\, as well as poss
 ibly improved elastic energy storage. However\, in small insects\, differe
 nt patterns are observed. Stingless bees (Meliponini) are a speciose tribe
  of tropical and subtropical bees that vary in body mass from 1 mg to &gt\
 ; 100 mg\, and therefore provide an excellent model group for examining th
 e scaling of flight kinematics and energetics across this relatively unexp
 lored size range. My former Ph.D. student\, Meghan Duell\, spent multiple 
 years in Panama studying the hovering flight of this group\, with a bit of
  help from me. Body size has strong effects on body temperatures achieved 
 during flight\, with larger bees (over 50 mg) having flight muscle tempera
 tures 10-13°C above air temperature\, while thorax temperatures of smalle
 r bees are 1-2°C above air temperature. Thorax mass scaled isometrically\
 , but larger species have relatively smaller and narrower forewings (scali
 ng slope of 0.5\, significantly less than the isometric prediction of 0.67
 ). In contrast to the hypometric scaling of flight metabolic rates shown f
 or larger bees and birds\, within these stingless bee species\, flight met
 abolic rate scales strongly hypermetrically\, with a scaling exponent of 2
 .25. This hypermetric scaling of flight metabolism cannot be explained by 
 temperature differences among the species\, as applying a Q10 correction o
 f 2 only reduces the scaling slope to 2.1. In contrast to larger insects a
 nd birds\, wing beat frequency is independent of mass\, averaging 170 Hz. 
 Regardless of body size\, stingless bees voluntarily lifted and flew with 
 nectar loads nearly equal to their body mass. Combining our data across al
 l insects that have been measured to date\, it appears that flight metabol
 ic rate scales hypermetrically (scaling slope = 1.2) for insects less than
  58 mg in body mass\, and hypometrically (slope = 0.67) for larger insects
 . The causes of this biphasic pattern remain unknown\, but the energetic b
 enefits to small size may arise from reduced lift requirements at lower Re
 ynolds numbers\, relatively larger wings\, and decreased wing venation.\nA
 n important question for understanding the effects of climatic warming on 
 agriculture and biodiversity is how warming temperatures will affect the f
 light of insect pollinators. In stingless bees\, both field body temperatu
 res and the critical temperature that stops flight increases with body siz
 e. For smaller species\, heat wave temperatures (up to 40°C) already exce
 ed those at which bees can fly\, suggesting that for these tropical specie
 s\, with CTmax values ranging from 33 – 44°C\, further climatic warming
  could strongly inhibit flight and foraging. Honey bees (Apis mellifera) a
 re the most important agricultural pollinator\, and are particularly well-
 adapted for heat\, having a CTmax value of approximately 48°C. But\, how 
 does variation in air and body temperature affect flight metabolic rate an
 d performance? Jordan Glass\, a current Ph.D. student in my lab has recent
 ly used variable gas mixtures to create a “flight treadmill” and to va
 ry body temperatures (heliox is more thermally conductive than nitrogen). 
 At 35°C air temperature\, thoracic temperature is little-affected by heli
 ox\, and flight metabolic rate increases about 1.4x until failure at a gas
  density below about 0.4 (relative to normal air density of about 1.3 kg m
 -3). However\, at 23°C air temperature\, thorax temperature and flight me
 tabolic rate falls strongly as the fraction of heliox increases\, and bees
  failed to hover at gas densities below 0.7\, likely due to their inabilit
 y to sustain flight muscle temperatures sufficient generate high power out
 put. Honey bees show a classic thermal performance curve for maximal fligh
 t metabolic rate\, with an optimal flight muscle temperature of 39°C\, an
 d an increase of about 2% per 1°C below the optimal temperature\, and a d
 ecrease of about 5% per 1°C above the optimal. Nectar loading up to 60% o
 f body mass increases thorax temperatures 2-4°C and flight metabolic rate
 s by about 30% at air temperatures of 20°C and 30°C\, but did not affect
  either parameter at an air temperature of 40°C\, at which thorax tempera
 tures are about 45°C. Bees prevent further overheating during flight at 4
 0°C air temperatures by dramatically increasing water loss rates. The fin
 ding that bees can carry similar heavy loads at flight muscle temperatures
  of 45°C with 30% less cost suggests an as yet unidentified mechanism (Jo
 rdan is still analyzing the high speed videos) to increase efficiency. Sup
 ported partially by USDA 2022-67013-36285.\nIOSSB Seminar
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://www.i2m.univ-amu.fr/wp-content/uploads/2
 022/11/Jon_Harrison.png
CATEGORIES:Interdisciplinary online seminar series on Biolocomotion
LOCATION:Virtual event\, visioconférence\, virtual\, France
X-APPLE-STRUCTURED-LOCATION;VALUE=URI;X-ADDRESS=visioconférence\, virtual\
 , France;X-APPLE-RADIUS=100;X-TITLE=Virtual event:geo:0,0
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Paris
X-LIC-LOCATION:Europe/Paris
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20221030T020000
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
END:VCALENDAR