Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Next revision | Previous revision | ||
start [2012/12/07 15:29] – Michael Kopp at Aix-Marseille University mkopp | start [2019/03/21 09:21] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | Under construction... | + | {{ :photo-1.jpg? |
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | //Michael Kopp\\ | ||
+ | Professor of Theoretical Biology and Evolution\\ | ||
+ | Groupe Mathématiques, | ||
+ | Institut de Mathématiques de Marseille UMR 7373 // | ||
+ | |||
+ | // | ||
+ | 3 Place Victor Hugo \\ | ||
+ | Case 18 \\ | ||
+ | 13331 Marseille Cedex 3 \\ | ||
+ | France \\ | ||
+ | ++33 4 13 55 12 01 // | ||
+ | |||
+ | michael.kopp[AT]univ-amu.fr | ||
+ | |||
+ | ====== General interests ====== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Most broadly, my interests are in ecology and evolutionary biology, in particular population genetics and evolutionary ecology. My own work focuses on theoretical modeling. Currently, my main projects are about competitive speciation and the genetics of adaptation to environmental change, but I am also interested in phenotypic plasticity, coevolution, | ||
+ | |||
+ | ====== The genetics of adaptation in changing environments ====== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Adaptation lies at the heart of Darwinian evolution, and it may be a key to the survival of species under the conditions of human-induced global change. Despite its importance, many basic questions about the genetic basis of adaptation are still unresolved. This is particularly true for adaptation to gradual environmental change, such as the rise of global temperature and atmospheric C02, or the accumulation of pollutants. To understand the consequences of gradual change, it is important to develop theory that incorporates both genetic and environmental dynamics. | ||
+ | |||
+ | As a starting point for such investigations, | ||
+ | |||
+ | ====== Models of sympatric and parapatric speciation ====== | ||
+ | |||
+ | In recent years, interest in sympatric speciation has increased considerably. Many theoretical studies have focused on the possibility that sympatric speciation can be be induced by intraspecific competition, | ||
+ | |||
+ | ====== Previous work ====== | ||
+ | |||
+ | In collaboration with Joachim Hermisson, I analyzed how frequency-dependent disruptive selection affects the genetic architecture of quantitative traits. Using a modifier approach, we predicted evolution of a highly asymmetric genetic architecture, | ||
+ | |||
+ | As a postdoc at the University of Tennessee in Knoxville, USA, I studied (together with Sergey Gavrilets) a multilocus model of predator-prey coevolution. The main purpose of this project was to compare the results from the one-locus and the multilocus case, and thus, to learn about the importance of genetic details in coevolutionary models. The results showed that the multilocus model is more prone to perform coevolutionary cycling, displays higher dynamic complexity and offers new insights into the maintenance of genetic variation. | ||
+ | |||
+ | As a PhD student at the Max-Planck-Institute of Limnology in Plön, Germany, I studied (in cooperation with Ralph Tollrian and Wilfried Gabriel) predation-related phenotypic plasticity in ciliated protozoa of the genera Euplotes, Colpidium, and Lembadion. In particular, I investigated a trophic size-polymorphism in Lembadion bullinum, and how this size-polymorphism interacts with an inducible defense in Euplotes octocarinatus. Furthermore, | ||
+ | |||
+ | I also collaborated with Jonathan Jeschke in projects on predator functional responses and on drift compensation in stream invertebrates. |