Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
shorttalksjune2021 [2022/10/30 21:44] – old revision restored (2021/06/21 18:07) 139.124.146.3 | shorttalksjune2021 [2022/10/30 21:44] (current) – old revision restored (2021/04/19 10:32) 139.124.146.3 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
As usual, the event will consist of short talks in 25-minute slots, including your new results, discussions, | As usual, the event will consist of short talks in 25-minute slots, including your new results, discussions, | ||
+ | |||
+ | If you want to give a talk, please write a message to Anna Frid. | ||
==== Speakers ==== | ==== Speakers ==== | ||
- | ** 15:00 [[https:// | + | ** [[http:// |
- | + | ||
- | {{seminar2021: | + | |
- | + | ||
- | The Nottingham group at a prime $p$ is the group of formal power series of the form $t+a_2 t^2 + \cdots$ with coefficients in a finite field with $p$ elements and with the group operation given by composition of power series. The group is known to be very large and to contain elements of order an arbitrary power of $p$. While there is a nice classification of elements of order $p$, only very few explicit examples of elements of higher order were known; in fact, all such examples were of order $4$ and essentially came from an automorphism of order $4$ of a supersingular elliptic curve. | + | |
- | + | ||
- | In the talk, we will explain why every conjugacy class of elements of finite order in this group contains a representative for which the sequence of coefficients is automatic, and we will show how to construct many explicit examples of such elements in terms of the automata that generate them. The talk is based on joint work with Gunther Cornelissen and Djurre Tijsma https:// | + | |
- | + | ||
- | ** 15:30 [[http:// | + | |
Jarosław Duda]] ** // | Jarosław Duda]] ** // | ||
- | |||
- | {{seminar2021: | ||
In Fibonacci coding we forbid ' | In Fibonacci coding we forbid ' | ||
- | |||
- | ** 16:00 [[https:// | ||
- | |||
- | Regular episturmian words are episturmian words whose | ||
- | directive words $x_1^{a_1} x_2^{a_2} \dotsm$ have the property that $x_1 | ||
- | x_2 \dotsm = u^\omega$ for a word $u$ whose all letters are distinct. | ||
- | This subclass of episturmian words contains all Sturmian words and | ||
- | generalizations of the Fibonacci word. | ||
- | |||
- | The Diophantine exponent $\mathrm{dio}(x)$ of an infinite word $x$ is | ||
- | the supremum $\rho$ of real numbers for which there exist arbitrarily | ||
- | long prefixes of $x$ of the form $UV^e$ such that $|UV^e|/ | ||
- | \rho$. This concept is especially interesting since $\mathrm{dio}(x)$ | ||
- | gives a lower bound for the irrationality exponent of the real number | ||
- | having $x$ as a fractional part. | ||
- | |||
- | In the talk, I will discuss how the Diophantine exponent of an infinite | ||
- | word can be found by studying its initial nonrepetitive complexity | ||
- | function. Then I will explain how to determine the initial nonrepetitive | ||
- | complexity of regular episturmian words and describe what can then be | ||
- | inferred of their Diophantine exponents. The main corollaries of the | ||
- | results are as follows. Under certain mild conditions, a real number | ||
- | having a regular episturmian word as a fractional part has irrationality | ||
- | exponent $> 2$. Moreover, such a number has irrationality exponent | ||
- | $\infty$ (i.e., it is a Liouville number) if and only if the | ||
- | corresponding directive word has unbounded partial quotients. | ||
- | |||
- | ** 16:30 [[https:// | ||
- | |||
- | {{seminar2021: | ||
- | |||
- | We investigate the scattered palindromic subwords in a finite word. We start by characterizing the words with the least number of scattered palindromic subwords. Then, we give an upper bound for the total number of palindromic subwords in a word of length $n$ in terms of Fibonacci number $F_n$ and prove that at most $F_n$ new scattered palindromic subwords can be created on the concatenation of a letter to a word of length $n − 1$. We then show that the maximum number of scattered palindromic subwords in a word depends both on the length of the word and the number of distinct letters in the word. We finally give a tight bound on the number of scattered palindromic subwords in a word of length $n$ that has at least $n/2$ distinct letters. | ||
- | |||
- | ** 17:00 Clément Lagisquet ** ([[https:// | ||
- | |||
- | {{seminar2021: | ||
- | |||
- | Markov numbers are the positive integer solutions of the Diophantine equation $x^2+y^2+z^2=3xyz$. In 1880, Markov showed that all solutions could be generated along a binary tree. Thus, it is quite natural and usual to index the Markov numbers by the rational in $[0,1]$, which has the same position in the Stern-Brocot tree. The Frobenius conjecture states that each Markov number appears one and only one time in the tree. | ||
- | |||
- | If the conjecture is true, then the ordering on the Markov numbers would give a new (strict) order on the rationals. In his book Aigner suggests three conjectures in order to better understand this ordering. The first was proved last year. In this work we prove the other two using techniques based on discrete geometry and combinatorics on word. | ||
- | We also generalize the Markov numbers to every couple $(p,q)$ in $\mathbb N^2$ (not only the relatively prime ones) and conjecture that the unicity still holds if $p<q$. Lastly, we prove that the three conjectures are still true for this superset. | ||
- | |||
- | Based on the submitted paper https:// | ||
- | |||
- | ** 17:30 [[https:// | ||
- | |||
- | Recently, [[https:// | ||
- | |||
- | While the conjecture remains open, further investigation of the subject pointed out certain " | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- |