Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| start [2025/01/28 18:36] – 139.124.146.3 | start [2025/12/12 20:34] (current) – anna.frid | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| [[http:// | [[http:// | ||
| [[http:// | [[http:// | ||
| - | [[https:// | + | [[https:// |
| [[https:// | [[https:// | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
| - | **February 11 2025: [[https:// | + | **January 6 2026: Louis Marin** //Maximal 2-dimensional binary words of bounded degree// |
| - | The palindromic length of the finite word $v$ is equal to the minimal number of palindromes whose concatenation is equal to $v$. It was conjectured in 2013 that for every infinite aperiodic word $x$, the palindromic length of its factors is not bounded. | + | (Authors: Alexandre Blondin Massé, Alain Goupil, Raphael L' |
| - | We prove this conjecture to be true. | + | |
| - | Here is [[https:// | + | Let $d$ be an integer between $0$ and $4$, and $W$ be a $2$-dimensional word of dimensions $h \times w$ on the binary alphabet $\{0, 1\}$, where $h, w \in \mathbb Z > 0$. Assume that each occurrence of the letter $1$ in $W$ is adjacent to at most $d$ letters $1$. We provide an exact formula for the maximum number of letters $1$ that can occur in $W$ for fixed $(h, w)$. As a byproduct, we deduce an upper bound on the length of maximum snake polyominoes contained in a $h \times w$ rectangle. |
| - | **February 25 2025: Bartek Pawlik** | ||
| - | **March 11 2025: | ||
| - | Hofstadter' | + | **January 20 2026: Savinien Kreczman** |
| - | $G(n)=n-G(G(n-1))$. Following Hofstadter, a family $(F_k)$ of similar | + | |
| - | functions is obtained by varying the number $k$ of nested recursive calls | + | |
| - | in this equation. We present here a few nice properties of these functions. | + | |
| - | In particular, they can be described via some infinite morphic words | + | |
| - | generalizing the Fibonacci word. This was crucial for proving that | + | |
| - | this family is ordered pointwise: for all $k$ and $n$, $F_k(n) \le F_{k+1}(n)$. | + | |
| - | Moreover, these functions have a simple behavior on well-chosen numerical | + | |
| - | representations (Zeckendorf decompositions for some Fibonacci-like sequences). | + | |
| - | Thanks to that, we were also able to estimate the discrepancies for these $F_k$, | + | |
| - | i.e. the maximal distances between each $F_k$ and its linear equivalent. | + | |
| - | This whole work was formally proved using the Coq proof assistant | + | |
| - | (except for a beautiful fractal !) and we will give a gentle introduction | + | |
| - | to this Coq development. | + | |
| - | Joint work with Shuo Li (U. Winnipeg) and Wolfgang Steiner (IRIF, Paris). | + | **February 3 2026: Annika Huch ** |
| + | **February 17 2026: Steven Robertson** | ||
| + | **March 03 2026: Ingrid Vukusic** | ||
| - | **March | + | **March |
| - | **April 8 2025: Hajime Kaneko** | + | **March 31 2026: Paulina Cecchi Bernales** |
| - | **April | + | **April |
| - | **May 6 2025: Jarkko Peltomäki** | + | In this talk, first, I will recall the notions of modulo-recurrent words and of window complexity. These notions are introduced in 2007. Then, I present some properties of these notions. After that, I will present the notions of uniform modulo-recurrence and of strong modulo-recurrence. These notions are defined recently in a joint work with Julien Cassaigne. Sturmian words are uniformly (resp. strongly) modulo-recurrent words. Then, I will address the window complexity of the Thue-Morse. To finish, I will present a recurrent aperiodic word with bounded window complexity. |
| - | **May 20 2025: Pranjal Jain** | + | **April 28 2026: [[https://kmlinux.fjfi.cvut.cz/~balkolub/| Ľubomíra Dvořáková]]** //Attractors |
| - | + | ||
| - | **June 3 2025: Curtis Bright** | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | **June 17 2025: [[https://sites.google.com/ | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | **July 15 2025: [[https:// | + | |
| - | We study automatic sequences and automatic systems (symbolic dynamical systems) generated by general constant length (nonprimitive) substitutions. While an automatic system is typically uncountable, | + | **May 12 2026: Léo Vivion** |
| + | **May 26 2026: Reem Yassawi** | ||
| ==== Past talks 2025 ==== | ==== Past talks 2025 ==== | ||
| - | {{ seminar2024:20250128mol.pdf |slides}} | + | ** December 9 2025: [[https:// |
| - | {{ seminar2024:20250128mol.mp4 |video of the talk}} | + | {{ seminar2025:20251209manea.pdf |slides by Tina Ringleb (Uni Göttingen)}} |
| + | {{ seminar2025: | ||
| - | **January 28 2025: [[https:// | + | It is well-known that checking whether a given string $w$ matches a given regular expression $r$ can be done in quadratic time $O(|w|⋅ |r|)$ and that this cannot be improved to a truly subquadratic running time of $O((|w|⋅ |r|)^{1-\varepsilon})$ assuming the strong exponential time hypothesis (SETH). We study a different matching paradigm where we ask instead whether $w$ has a subsequence that matches $r$, and show that regex matching in this sense can be solved in linear time $O(|w| + |r|)$. Further, the same holds if we ask for a supersequence. We show that the quantitative variants where we want to compute a longest or shortest subsequence or supersequence of w that matches $r$ can be solved in $O(|w|⋅ |r|)$, i. e., asymptotically no worse than classical regex matching; |
| - | We construct an infinite additive 5-power-free rich word over $\{0,1\}$ and an infinite additive 4-power-free rich word over $\{0,1,2\}$. Both constructions involve affine morphisms, for which the length | + | This is based on the paper: Antoine Amarilli, Florin Manea, Tina Ringleb, Markus L. Schmid: Linear Time Subsequence |
| + | **November 25 2025: [[https:// | ||
| - | **January 14 2025: [[https:// | + | {{ seminar2025:20251125mollo.pdf |slides}} |
| + | {{ seminar2025: | ||
| - | {{ seminar2025: | ||
| - | Work in collaboration with Jeffrey Shallit. | ||
| - | 1. The set of Christoffel matrices (that is, Burrows-Wheeler matrices | + | A shuffler |
| - | (this result was also obtained independently by Luca Zamboni) | + | |
| - | 2. The determinant of a Christoffel matrix has a simple form, using the Zolotareff symbol (the latter extends the Jacobi symbol). | ||
| - | 3. Taking $n$ factors of length $n$ of a Sturmian sequence over $0$, $1$, one obtains a matrix and a determinant. There are$n+1$ such determinants; | + | **November 11 2025: [[https:// |
| + | {{ seminar2025: | ||
| + | {{ seminar2025: | ||
| - | ==== Past talks 2024 ==== | ||
| - | **December 17 2024: [[https:// | ||
| - | {{ seminar2024:20241217nakashima.pdf |slides}} | + | A very common problem type in combinatorics on words is to construct words (under constraints) that avoid repetition. This is often done by constructing suitable morphisms. |
| + | Here we flip the setup: we ask how good morphisms are at introducing repetitions into words. Periodic morphisms are trivially very good at this, but how about less trivial classes of morphisms? | ||
| - | {{ seminar2024: | + | We consider a few variations of this question. We characterize finite words that do not have an upper bound on fractional or integer exponents when mapped via injective morphisms. Then we consider the asymptotic critical exponent |
| + | This talk is an extended version of the one presented at DLT 2025. It is based on joint work with Eva Foster and Aleksi Saarela, and on ongoing research. | ||
| - | A string $s$ is called a parameterized square when $s = xy$ for strings $x$, $y$ and $x$ and $y$ are parameterized equivalent. | + | **October 14 2025: [[https:// |
| - | Kociumaka et al. showed the number of parameterized squares, which are non-equivalent in parameterized equivalence, | + | |
| - | Recently, we showed that the maximum number | + | |
| - | This is a joint work with Rikuya Hamai, Kazushi Taketsugu, Shunsuke Inenaga, and Hideo Bannai (presented at SPIRE 2024). | ||
| + | {{ seminar2025: | ||
| + | {{ seminar2025: | ||
| - | **December 3 2024: POSTPONED ** | + | This presentation is concerned with hypercubic billiards with irrational trajectories. In this talk, I will present the relationship between balance properties in hypercubic billiards, and subshift cohomology. |
| - | **November 19 2024: [[https:// | + | More precisely, I will define cohomology for subshifts and (time permitting) illustrate with examples of how cohomology has previously been used in symbolic dynamics. Then, I will present the link between cohomology and balance for billiard sequences. Finally, I will explain how results |
| + | |||
| + | In the case of billiards in the cube, we also showed (using other methods) that these sequences are not balanced on factors of length 2. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Joint work with Nicolas Bédaride and Valérie Berthé. | ||
| - | {{ seminar2024: | ||
| - | A hypercubic billiard word in dimension $d$ is an infinite $d$-ary word encoding the faces successively hit by a billiard ball moving in the unit cub of $\mathbb{R}^d$, | ||
| - | While the subword complexity of hypercubic billiard words has been extensively studied at the end of the 1990s and the beginning of the 2000s (Arnoux, Mauduit, Shiokawa and Tamura 1994, Baryshnikov 1995 and Bédaride 2003-2009), their abelian properties have been much less studied: only Vuillon (2003) initiated the study of their balancedness. | + | **September 16 2025: Kaisei Kishi** //Net Occurrences in Fibonacci |
| - | In this talk, I will first recall the results obtained by Vuillon, and then, give a complete characterization of the imbalance of hypercubic billiard words generated by a momentum with rationally independent coordinates. In a second part, I will also discuss the case of momenta with rationally dependent coordinates. | + | {{ seminar2025: |
| + | {{ seminar2025: | ||
| + | In a string $T$, an occurrence of a substring $S=T[i ... j]$ is a net occurrence if $S$ is repeated in $T$, while both left extension $T[i-1, ... j]$ and right extension $T[i, ... j+1]$ are unique in $T$. The number of net occurrences of $S$ in $T$ is called its net frequency. Compared with ordinary frequency, net frequency highlights the more significant occurrences of $S$ in $T$. In this talk, I will present several properties of net occurrences and describe techniques to identify all the net occurrences in Fibonacci and Thue-Morse words. In particular, I will explain the technique to characterize the occurrences of smaller-order Fibonacci and Thue-Morse words. This is a joint work with Peaker Guo. | ||
| - | **November 05 2024: [[https:// | ||
| - | {{ seminar2024:20241105hellouin.pdf |slides}} | + | **September 2 2025: Gandhar Joshi** // |
| - | {{ seminar2024:20241105hellouin.mp4 |video of the talk}} | + | {{ seminar2025:20250902joshi.pdf |slides}} |
| + | {{ seminar2025: | ||
| + | This is joint work with Dan Rust. We define Monochromatic arithmetic progression (MAP) as the repetition of a symbol (traditionally colour) with a constant difference in a sequence. We study thresholds of the lengths of MAPs in the Fibonacci word in our paper https:// | ||
| - | A string attractor of a word w is a set of marked positions such that every factor of w has an occurrence that crosses one of the marked positions. This is a recent concept whose motivation comes from the study of compression algorithms, but that was studied very soon after for its combinatorial properties. In particular, the size or span of the smallest string attractor for a word can be seen as a measure of its complexity, and this point of view led to studying smallest string attractors for families of classical words, such as the prefixes of the Fibonacci word. | ||
| - | While it is fruitful to study smallest string attractors on finite prefixes or factors of infinite words, we can also define string attractors directly on infinite words. Unfortunately, | + | **July 15 2025: [[https:// |
| - | Fortunately, | + | {{ seminar2025: |
| - | This is a joint work with Pierre Béaur and France Gheeraert. | + | {{ seminar2025: |
| + | We study automatic sequences and automatic systems (symbolic dynamical systems) generated by general constant length (nonprimitive) substitutions. While an automatic system is typically uncountable, | ||
| - | **October 22 2024: [[https:// | ||
| - | {{ seminar2024: | ||
| - | {{ seminar2024:20241022carton.mp4 |video of the talk}} | + | **June 17 2025: [[https:// |
| + | {{ seminar2025: | ||
| - | Let $U = (u_n)$ be a Pisot numeration system. A sequence $(f_n)$ taking values | + | {{ seminar2025: |
| - | over a commutative ring $R$, possibly infinite, is said to be // | + | |
| - | if there exists a // | + | |
| - | $(n)_U$. | + | |
| - | were introduced and studied by Allouche and Shallit, and they are a | + | |
| - | generalisation | + | |
| - | deterministic automaton when it reads $(n)_q$. | + | |
| - | the connection between $q$-regular sequences, and // | + | |
| - | equations. In particular a $q$-regular sequence gives a solution to an | + | |
| - | equation of $q$-Mahler type, and conversely, the solution of an | + | |
| - | // | + | |
| - | We define generalised equations of $Z$-Mahler type, based on the Zeckendorf | ||
| - | numeration system $Z$. We show that if a sequence over a commutative ring is | ||
| - | $Z$-regular, | ||
| - | solution of a $Z$-Mahler equation. Conversely, if the $Z$-Mahler equation is | ||
| - | isolating, then its solutions define $Z$-regular sequences. | ||
| - | example to show that there exist non-isolating $Z$-Mahler equations whose | ||
| - | solutions do not define $Z$-regular sequences. Our proof yields a new | ||
| - | construction of weighted automata that generate classical $q$-regular | ||
| - | sequences. | ||
| - | This is joint work with Reem Yassawi. | + | One way to study the distribution of nested quadratic number fields satisfying fixed arithmetic relationships is through the evolution of continued fraction expansions. In the function field setting, it was shown by de Mathan and Teullie that given a quadratic irrational $\Theta$, the degrees of the periodic part of the continued fraction of $t^n\Theta$ are unbounded. Paulin and Shapira improved this by proving that quadratic irrationals exhibit partial escape of mass. Moreover, they conjectured that they must exhibit full escape of mass. We construct counterexamples to their conjecture in every characteristic. In this talk we shall discuss the technique of proof as well as the connection between escape of mass in continued fractions, Hecke trees, and number walls. |
| - | **October 8 2024: [[https:// | ||
| - | // | ||
| - | {{ seminar2024:20241008golafshan.pdf |slides}} | + | **June 3 2025: [[https:// |
| - | {{ seminar2024: | + | Automated reasoning tools have been effectively used to solve a variety |
| + | {{ seminar2025: | ||
| - | In this talk, we explore the dynamics of unipotent flows on a torus and how these techniques lead to interesting applications in number theory. Specifically, | + | {{ seminar2025:20250603bright.mp4 |video of the talk}} |
| - | Based on a joint work with Ivan Mitrofanov: https:// | ||
| - | **September 24 2024: [[http://lukeschaeffer.com/|Luke Schaeffer]]** //Summation and transduction | + | **May 20 2025: [[https://www.researchgate.net/ |
| - | {{ seminar2024:20240924schaeffer.pdf |slides}} | + | {{ seminar2025:20250520jain.pdf |slides}} |
| - | {{ seminar2024:20240924schaeffer.mp4 |video of the talk}} | + | {{ seminar2025:20250520jain.mp4 |video of the talk}} |
| - | We examine | + | Let $w$ be a finite word over the alphabet $\{0,1\}$. For any natural number $n$, let $s_w(n)$ denote the number |
| + | **May 6 2025: Jarkko Peltomäki** //The repetition threshold for ternary rich words// | ||
| + | {{ seminar2025: | ||
| - | **September 10 2024: [[https:// | + | {{ seminar2025:20250506peltomaki.mp4 |video of the talk}} |
| - | {{ seminar2024: | ||
| - | In this talk we introduce a new notion | + | In the recent years, it has been popular |
| - | measure | + | |
| - | which are either rational or transcendental. | + | |
| - | We study basic properties of this notion, and | + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | we shall characterize all the automatic numbers | + | |
| - | which are transparent. As applications, we shall | + | |
| - | also compute | + | |
| - | automatic numbers. | + | |
| + | Joint work with L. Mol and J. D. Currie. | ||
| - | **July 9 2024: [[https:// | ||
| - | {{ seminar2024:20240709simpson.pdf |slides}} | + | **April 22 2025: [[https:// |
| - | {{ seminar2024: | ||
| - | If $p$ and $s$ are palindromes then a factor of the infinite word $(ps)^\omega$ which has length at least $|ps|$ is called a palindromic periodicity. | + | {{ seminar2025: |
| + | Given an infinite word $w$, its complexity function $p_w(n)$ counts the number of distinct subwords of length $n$ it contains. A longstanding open problem in the combinatorics of infinite words is the {\it inverse problem}: describe which functions $f: \mathbb N \to \mathbb N$ arise as complexity functions of infinite words. Such functions must be non-decreasing and, unless eventually constant, strictly increasing; they must also be submultiplicative, | ||
| + | We resolve this problem up to asymptotic equivalence in the sense of large-scale geometry. Specifically, | ||
| - | **June 25 2024: [[http:// | + | Joint work with C. G. Moreira and E. Zelmanov. |
| - | {{ seminar2024: | ||
| - | {{ seminar2024:20240625cassaigne.mp4 |video of the talk}} | + | **April 8 2025: [[https:// |
| + | one-sided shift spaces// | ||
| + | {{ seminar2025: | ||
| - | Many families of infinite words (or of subshifts) have a subword complexity | + | {{ seminar2025: |
| - | function $p(n)$ that grows linearly. It has sometimes a very simple form | + | |
| - | (such as $n + 1$, $2n + 1$, etc.), but often a more complicated behaviour, | + | |
| - | as for the Thue-Morse word. In his Ph.D. thesis, Alex Heinis introduced the | + | |
| - | set $\Omega$ | + | |
| - | and $\beta = \limsup p(n)/n$ for some infinite word. For instance, | + | |
| - | Thue-Morse word gives the point $(3, 10/ | + | |
| - | $\alpha \leq \beta$ can be obtained, and it is a challenge to characterize | + | |
| - | points in $\Omega$. | + | |
| - | questions that we find interesting. | + | |
| - | **June 11 2024: [[https:// | + | The Lagrange spectrum is related to the rational approximations of badly |
| + | approximable numbers. The discrete part of the spectrum is denoted in terms | ||
| + | of Christoffel words. A multiplicative analog of the Lagrange spectrum was | ||
| + | recently investigated, | ||
| + | the minimal limit points of certain multiplicative Markoff-Lagrange spectra in | ||
| + | terms of symbolic dynamical systems and certain substitutions. | ||
| - | {{ seminar2024: | + | In this talk, we study an analog of the Markoff-Lagrange spectrum for general |
| + | one-sided shift spaces. As our main results, we determine the discrete parts and | ||
| + | minimal limit points in terms of $S$-adic sequences, where $S$ is an infinite set of | ||
| + | substitutions. This is joint work with Wolfgang Steiner. | ||
| - | {{ seminar2024: | ||
| + | **March 25 2025: [[https:// | ||
| - | A morphism is Parikh-collinear if its adjacency matrix has rank at most one. For example, the famous Thue-Morse morphism is such morphism. Some of their properties have been considered in the literature, e.g., by Allouche et al. [Comb. Theory 1, 2021] (in passing) and Cassaigne et al. [Int. J. Found. Comput. 22, 2011]; the latter characterises Parikh-collinear morphisms as those morphisms that map any infinite word (over the domain alphabet) to a word with bounded abelian complexity. | ||
| - | In this talk I will focus on properties of Parikh-collinear morphisms and their fixed points from the viewpoint of binomial complexities. We will also consider automatic (in the sense of Allouche and Shallit) aspects related to such fixed points. | + | {{ seminar2025: |
| - | The talk is based on joint work with M. Rigo and M. Stipulanti. | + | {{ seminar2025: |
| - | **May 28 2024: [[https:// | ||
| - | {{ seminar2024: | + | We study some properties of the growth rate of $L(A,F)$, that is, the language of words over the alphabet $A$ avoiding the set of forbidden factors $F$. We first provide a sufficient condition on $F$ and $A$ for the growth of $L(A,F)$ to be boundedly supermultiplicative. |
| + | We also apply our technique to the specific setting of power-free words where the argument can be slightly refined to provide better bounds. Finally, we apply a similar idea to $F$-free circular words and in particular we make progress toward a conjecture of Shur about the number of square-free circular words. | ||
| + | |||
| - | {{ seminar2024: | ||
| + | **March 11 2025: | ||
| + | {{ seminar2025: | ||
| - | The famous Hall-Thue word, fixed point of the morphism | + | Hofstadter' |
| - | 0 -> 012, 1 -> 02, 2 -> 1, is essentially | + | $G(n)=n-G(G(n-1))$. Following Hofstadter, a family $(F_k)$ |
| - | ternary word avoiding squares | + | functions is obtained by varying |
| + | in this equation. We present here a few nice properties of these functions. | ||
| + | In particular, they can be described via some infinite morphic words | ||
| + | generalizing the Fibonacci word. This was crucial for proving that | ||
| + | this family is ordered pointwise: for all $k$ and $n$, $F_k(n) \le F_{k+1}(n)$. | ||
| + | Moreover, these functions have a simple behavior on well-chosen numerical | ||
| + | representations (Zeckendorf decompositions for some Fibonacci-like sequences). | ||
| + | Thanks to that, we were also able to estimate | ||
| + | i.e. the maximal distances between each $F_k$ and its linear equivalent. | ||
| + | This whole work was formally proved using the Coq proof assistant | ||
| + | (except for a beautiful fractal !) and we will give a gentle introduction | ||
| + | to this Coq development. | ||
| - | I will present many examples of this phenomenon, that is, | + | Joint work with Shuo Li (U. Winnipeg) and Wolfgang Steiner (IRIF, Paris). |
| - | when every recurrent word satisfying some avoidance constraints | + | |
| - | has the same factor set as a morphic word. | + | |
| - | This is a joint work with Golnaz Badkobeh, Matthieu Rosenfeld, | ||
| - | L' | ||
| - | James Currie, Lucas Mol, Narad Rampersad, and Jeffrey Shallit. | ||
| - | **May 14 2024: [[https://dblp.org/pid/10/10715.html|Josef Rukavicka]]** //Restivo Salemi property for $\alpha$-power free languages with $\alpha \geq 5$ and $k \geq 3$ letters// | + | **February 25 2025: [[https://ms.polsl.pl/pracownik.php? |
| - | {{ seminar2024:20240514rukavicka.pdf |slides}} | + | {{ seminar2025:20250225pawlik.pdf |slides}} |
| - | {{ seminar2024:20240514rukavicka.mp4 |video of the talk}} | + | {{ seminar2025:20250225pawlik.mp4 |video of the talk}} |
| - | In 2009, Shur published the following conjecture: Let $L$ be a power-free language and let $e(L)\subseteq L$ be the set of words of $L$ that can be extended to a bi-infinite word respecting the given power-freeness. If $u,v \in e(L)$ then $uwv \in e(L)$ for some word $w$. Let $L_{k, | + | Work in collaboration |
| - | https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.10061 | + | If, in a given word $W$, each letter appears an even number of times, then $W$ can be split into two identical, disjoint subwords. For example, the word $\mathtt{hotshots}$ can be split into two $\mathtt{hots}$ by dividing the word exactly in the middle: $\mathtt{hots\, |
| - | **April 30 2024: [[https:// | ||
| - | {{ seminar2024:20240430baake.pdf |slides}} | + | **February 11 2025: [[https:// |
| - | {{ seminar2024:20240430baake.mp4 |video of the talk}} | + | {{ seminar2025:20250211rukavicka.pdf |slides}} |
| - | The recently discovered Hat is an aperiodic | + | {{ seminar2025: |
| - | monotile for the Euclidean plane, which needs a reflected | + | |
| - | version for this property. The Spectre does not have this | + | |
| - | (tiny) deficiency. We discuss the topological and dynamical | + | |
| - | properties | + | |
| - | what the long-range order of both tilings is. Finally, we | + | |
| - | briefly describe the analogous structure for the Spectre tiling. | + | |
| + | The palindromic length of the finite word $v$ is equal to the minimal number of palindromes whose concatenation is equal to $v$. It was conjectured in 2013 that for every infinite aperiodic word $x$, the palindromic length of its factors is not bounded. | ||
| + | We prove this conjecture to be true. | ||
| - | **April 16 2024: [[https://dblp.org/pid/215/5120.html|Radosław Piórkowski]]** //Universal quantification in automatic structures—an ExpSpace-hard nut to crack// | + | Here is [[https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.12714|the paper]]. |
| - | {{ seminar2024: | ||
| - | Automatic structures are structures whose universe and relations can be represented as regular languages. It follows from the standard closure properties of regular languages that the first-order theory of an automatic structure is decidable. | ||
| - | While existential quantifiers can be eliminated in linear time by application of a homomorphism, | ||
| - | We answer this question negatively. | ||
| - | In my talk, following a short introduction to the field of automatic structures, I will present the construction of a family of NFA representing automatic relations for which the minimal NFA recognising the language after a universal projection step is doubly exponential, | ||
| + | **January 28 2025: [[https:// | ||
| - | Based on the paper: https:// | + | {{ seminar2025:20250128mol.pdf |slides}} |
| - | Authors: Christoph Haase, R.P. | + | {{ seminar2025:20250128mol.mp4 |video of the talk}} |
| - | Keywords: automatic structures, universal projection, tiling problems, state complexity. | ||
| + | We construct an infinite additive 5-power-free rich word over $\{0,1\}$ and an infinite additive 4-power-free rich word over $\{0, | ||
| - | **April 2 2024: John Campbell** // On the evaluation of infinite products involving automatic sequences// | ||
| - | {{ seminar2024: | ||
| - | {{ seminar2024:20240402campbell.mp4 |video of the talk}} | + | **January 14 2025: [[https:// |
| - | We explore and discuss some recently introduced techniques concerning the evaluation | + | {{ seminar2025: |
| + | Work in collaboration with Jeffrey Shallit. | ||
| + | 1. The set of Christoffel matrices (that is, Burrows-Wheeler matrices of Christoffel words) of size $n$ by $n$, where the alphabet is some commutative ring $R$, form a monoid under multiplication, | ||
| + | (this result was also obtained independently by Luca Zamboni) | ||
| - | **March 19 2024: [[https:// | + | 2. The determinant |
| - | {{ seminar2024: | + | 3. Taking |
| - | + | ||
| - | {{ seminar2024: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | In this talk $N$-expansions, | + | |
| - | of digits, will be introduced. Although | + | |
| - | recent as 2008 by Ed Burger and some of his students, quite a number of | + | |
| - | papers have appeared on these variations of the regular continued fraction | + | |
| - | expansion. By choosing a domain for the underlying Gauss-map which does | + | |
| - | not contain the origin, a continued fraction with finitely many digits was | + | |
| - | introduced by Niels Langeveld in his MSc-thesis. It turns out that these | + | |
| - | continued fraction algorithms exhibit a very complicated and surprising rich | + | |
| - | dynamical behavior. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | This talk is based on joint work with Yufei Chen (Shanghai, Delft), Jaap | + | |
| - | de Jonge (UvA, Amsterdam), Karma Dajani (Utrecht), Niels Langeveld | + | |
| - | (Montan U., Leoben), Hitoshi Nakada (Keio, Yokohama), and Niels van der | + | |
| - | Wekken (Netcompany). | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | **March 5 2024: [[https:// | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | {{ seminar2024: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | {{ seminar2024: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | Let $S$ be a finite subset of $\mathbb{Z}^n$. A vector | + | |
| - | sequence $(z_i)$ is an $S$-walk if and only if $z_{i+1}-z_i$ is an | + | |
| - | element of $S$ for all $i$. Gerver and Ramsey showed in 1979 that for | + | |
| - | $S\subset\mathbb{Z}^3$ there exists an infinite $S$-walk in which no | + | |
| - | $5^{11}+1=48,828,126$ points are collinear. Using the same general | + | |
| - | approach, but with the aid of a computer search, we show how to | + | |
| - | improve the bound to $189$. We begin by restating the infinite | + | |
| - | $S$-walk as the fixed point of iterating a morphism defined for a $12$ | + | |
| - | letter alphabet. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | **February 20 2024: [[https:// | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | {{ seminar2024: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | {{ seminar2024: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | For a $\mathbb Z^d$ topological dynamical system $(X, T, \mathbb Z^d)$, an isomorphism is a self-homeomorphism $\phi : X\to X$ such that for some matrix | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | These isomorphisms are not well understood even for classical systems. In this talk we will present a description of them for odometers and more precisely for $\mathbb Z^2$-constant base odometers, that is not simple. We deduce a complete description of the isomorphism of some $\mathbb Z^2$ minimal substitution subshifts. Thanks to this, we will give the first known example of a minimal zero-entropy subshift with the largest possible normalizer group. | + | |
| - | This is a joint work with Samuel Petite (Universitè de Picardie Jules Verne). | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | **February 6 2024: [[https:// | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | {{ seminar2024: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | {{ seminar2024: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | A theorem of Christol gives a characterization of automatic sequences over a finite field: a sequence is automatic if and only if its generating series is algebraic. Since there are two representations for such a sequence -- as an automaton and as a bivariate polynomial -- a natural question is how the size of one representation relates to the size of the other. Bridy used tools from algebraic geometry to bound the size of the minimal automaton in terms of the size of the minimal polynomial. We have a new proof of Bridy' | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | **January 23 2024: [[https:// | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | {{ seminar2024: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | {{ seminar2024: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | It is well-known that the subword complexity of an automatic sequence grows at most linearly, meaning that the number of length-$\ell$ subwords which appear in a given automatic sequence $a = (a(n))_n$ is at most $C \ell$ for a constant $C$ dependent only on $a$. In contrast, arithmetic subword complexity measures the number of subwords which appear along arithmetic progressions, | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Together with Jakub Byszewski and Clemens Müllner we obtained a decomposition result which allows us to express any (complex-valued) automatic sequence as the sum of a structured part, which is easy to work with, and a part which is pseudorandom | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | This talk is based on joint work with Jakub Byszewski and Clemens Müllner, and is closely related to the previous talk of Clemens Müllner at One World Combinatorics on Words Seminar. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | **January 9 2024: [[https:// | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | {{ seminar2024: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | {{ seminar2024: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | Automatic sequences - that is, sequences computable by finite automata - have long been studied from the point of view of combinatorics on words. A notable property of these sequences is that their subword-complexity is at most linear. Avgustinovich, | + | |
| - | They also showed that a special class of synchronizing automatic sequences have at most linear arithmetic subword-complexity and some other class of automatic sequences on the alphabet $\Sigma$ have maximal possible subword-complexity $|\Sigma|^n$. | + | |
| - | Synchronizing automatic sequences can be efficiently approximated using periodic functions and are usually more structured than general automatic sequences. We discuss a recent result showing that the arithmetic (and even polynomial) subword-complexity of synchronizing automatic sequences grows subexponentially. This was a key result to show that the subword-complexity of synchronizing automatic sequences along regularly growing sequences (such as Piatetski-Shapiro sequences) grows subexponentially, | ||
| - | This is joint work with Jean-Marc Deshouillers, | ||
| ==== Archives 2024 ==== | ==== Archives 2024 ==== | ||
| - | The talks of 2023 are available [[2024|here]]. | + | The talks of 2024 are available [[2024|here]]. |
| ==== Archives 2023 ==== | ==== Archives 2023 ==== | ||