Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
start [2025/03/25 18:53] – 139.124.146.3 | start [2025/07/15 20:36] (current) – 82.66.107.61 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
==== Upcoming talks ==== | ==== Upcoming talks ==== | ||
+ | **September 2 2025: Gandhar Joshi** | ||
- | **April 8 2025: [https:// | + | **September 16 2025: Kaisei Kishi** |
+ | |||
+ | **October 28 2025: Idrissa Kaboré** | ||
+ | |||
+ | **November 11 2025: Aleksi Vanhatalo** | ||
+ | |||
+ | **November 25 2025: Ignacio Mollo** | ||
+ | |||
+ | ** December 9 2025: Florin Manea** | ||
+ | |||
+ | **December 23 2025: Savinien Kreczman** | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Past talks 2025 ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | **July 15 2025: [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{ seminar2025: | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{ seminar2025: | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | We study automatic sequences and automatic systems (symbolic dynamical systems) generated by general constant length (nonprimitive) substitutions. While an automatic system is typically uncountable, | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | **June 17 2025: [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{ seminar2025: | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{ seminar2025: | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | One way to study the distribution of nested quadratic number fields satisfying fixed arithmetic relationships is through the evolution of continued fraction expansions. In the function field setting, it was shown by de Mathan and Teullie that given a quadratic irrational $\Theta$, the degrees of the periodic part of the continued fraction of $t^n\Theta$ are unbounded. Paulin and Shapira improved this by proving that quadratic irrationals exhibit partial escape of mass. Moreover, they conjectured that they must exhibit full escape of mass. We construct counterexamples to their conjecture in every characteristic. In this talk we shall discuss the technique of proof as well as the connection between escape of mass in continued fractions, Hecke trees, and number walls. This is part of joint works with Erez Nesharim and Uri Shapira and with Steven Robertson. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | **June 3 2025: [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | Automated reasoning tools have been effectively used to solve a variety of problems in discrete mathematics. | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{ seminar2025: | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{ seminar2025: | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | **May 20 2025: [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{ seminar2025: | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{ seminar2025: | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Let $w$ be a finite word over the alphabet $\{0,1\}$. For any natural number $n$, let $s_w(n)$ denote the number of occurrences of $w$ in the binary expansion of $n$ as a scattered subsequence. The talk aims to provide a systematic way of studying the growth of the partial sum $\sum_{n=0}^N (-1)^{s_w(n)}$ as $N \to \infty$. In particular, these techniques yield several classes of words $w$ with $\sum_{n=0}^N (-1)^{s_w(n)} = O(N^{1-\epsilon})$ for some $\epsilon >0$. We begin by motivating the ideas using the case of $w=01,011$. The talk is based on joint work with Shuo Li. | ||
+ | |||
+ | **May 6 2025: Jarkko Peltomäki** //The repetition threshold for ternary rich words// | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{ seminar2025: | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{ seminar2025: | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | In the recent years, it has been popular to determine the least critical exponent in specific families of infinite words. In this talk, I will explain what is known about the least critical exponents for infinite words that are rich in palindromes. In particular, I will outline the proof of our result that the least critical exponent for ternary rich infinite words equals $1 + 1/(3 - \mu) \approx 2.25876324$, | ||
+ | |||
+ | Joint work with L. Mol and J. D. Currie. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | **April 22 2025: [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | {{ seminar2025: | ||
+ | |||
+ | Given an infinite word $w$, its complexity function $p_w(n)$ counts the number of distinct subwords of length $n$ it contains. A longstanding open problem in the combinatorics of infinite words is the {\it inverse problem}: describe which functions $f: \mathbb N \to \mathbb N$ arise as complexity functions of infinite words. Such functions must be non-decreasing and, unless eventually constant, strictly increasing; they must also be submultiplicative, | ||
+ | |||
+ | We resolve this problem up to asymptotic equivalence in the sense of large-scale geometry. Specifically, | ||
+ | |||
+ | Joint work with C. G. Moreira and E. Zelmanov. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | **April 8 2025: [[https:// | ||
one-sided shift spaces// | one-sided shift spaces// | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{ seminar2025: | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{ seminar2025: | ||
+ | |||
The Lagrange spectrum is related to the rational approximations of badly | The Lagrange spectrum is related to the rational approximations of badly | ||
Line 38: | Line 123: | ||
substitutions. This is joint work with Wolfgang Steiner. | substitutions. This is joint work with Wolfgang Steiner. | ||
- | **April 22 2025: Be'eri Greenfeld** | ||
- | **May 6 2025: Jarkko Peltomäki** | + | **March 25 2025: [[https:// |
- | **May 20 2025: Pranjal Jain** | ||
- | **June 3 2025: Curtis Bright** | + | {{ seminar2025:20250325bui.pdf |slides}} |
- | **June 17 2025: [[https:// | + | {{ seminar2025:20250325bui.mp4 |video of the talk}} |
- | **July 15 2025: [[https:// | ||
- | We study automatic sequences and automatic systems (symbolic dynamical systems) generated by general constant length (nonprimitive) substitutions. While an automatic system is typically uncountable, | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | ==== Past talks 2025 ==== | ||
- | |||
- | **March 25 2025: [[https:// | ||
We study some properties of the growth rate of $L(A,F)$, that is, the language of words over the alphabet $A$ avoiding the set of forbidden factors $F$. We first provide a sufficient condition on $F$ and $A$ for the growth of $L(A,F)$ to be boundedly supermultiplicative. | We study some properties of the growth rate of $L(A,F)$, that is, the language of words over the alphabet $A$ avoiding the set of forbidden factors $F$. We first provide a sufficient condition on $F$ and $A$ for the growth of $L(A,F)$ to be boundedly supermultiplicative. |