Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision |
start [2025/06/24 19:43] – 139.124.146.3 | start [2025/07/15 20:36] (current) – 82.66.107.61 |
---|
| |
==== Upcoming talks ==== | ==== Upcoming talks ==== |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
**July 15 2025: [[https://apacz.matinf.uj.edu.pl/users/1719-elzbieta-krawczyk|Elżbieta Krawczyk]]** //Quasi-fixed points of substitutions and substitutive systems// | |
| |
We study automatic sequences and automatic systems (symbolic dynamical systems) generated by general constant length (nonprimitive) substitutions. While an automatic system is typically uncountable, the set of automatic sequences is countable, implying that most sequences within an automatic system are not themselves automatic. We provide a complete classification of automatic sequences that lie in a given automatic system in terms of the so-called quasi-fixed points of the substitution defining the system. Quasi-fixed points have already appeared implicitly in a few places (e.g. in the study of substitutivity of lexicographically minimal points in substitutive systems or in the study of subsystems of substitutive systems) and they have been described in detail by Shallit and Wang and, more recently, B\'eal, Perrin, and Restivo . We conjecture that a similar statement holds for general nonconstant length substitutions. | |
| |
| |
**September 2 2025: Gandhar Joshi** | **September 2 2025: Gandhar Joshi** |
| |
==== Past talks 2025 ==== | ==== Past talks 2025 ==== |
| |
| **July 15 2025: [[https://apacz.matinf.uj.edu.pl/users/1719-elzbieta-krawczyk|Elżbieta Krawczyk]]** //Quasi-fixed points of substitutions and substitutive systems// |
| |
| {{ seminar2025:20250715krawczyk.pdf |slides}} |
| |
| {{ seminar2025:20250715krawczyk.mp4 |video of the talk}} |
| |
| |
| We study automatic sequences and automatic systems (symbolic dynamical systems) generated by general constant length (nonprimitive) substitutions. While an automatic system is typically uncountable, the set of automatic sequences is countable, implying that most sequences within an automatic system are not themselves automatic. We provide a complete classification of automatic sequences that lie in a given automatic system in terms of the so-called quasi-fixed points of the substitution defining the system. Quasi-fixed points have already appeared implicitly in a few places (e.g. in the study of substitutivity of lexicographically minimal points in substitutive systems or in the study of subsystems of substitutive systems) and they have been described in detail by Shallit and Wang and, more recently, Béal, Perrin, and Restivo . We conjecture that a similar statement holds for general nonconstant length substitutions. |
| |
| |
| |
**June 17 2025: [[https://sites.google.com/view/noysofferaranov/bio|Noy Soffer Aranov]]** //Escape of Mass of Sequences// | **June 17 2025: [[https://sites.google.com/view/noysofferaranov/bio|Noy Soffer Aranov]]** //Escape of Mass of Sequences// |