Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| start [2026/01/12 19:12] – anna.frid | start [2026/02/10 14:43] (current) – anna.frid | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
| ==== Upcoming talks ==== | ==== Upcoming talks ==== | ||
| - | **January 20 2026: Savinien Kreczman** //Factor complexity and critical exponent | + | **February 17 2026: [[https:// |
| - | The Thue-Morse, Fibonacci-Thue-Morse and Allouche-Johnson words are related to the binary, Zeckendorf and Narayana numeration systems respectively, | + | Given any one-dimensional sequence S, one can generate a unique two-dimensional sequence by considering |
| - | + | ||
| - | In a recent preprint, J.Shallit put forth two conjectures on words of this family, the first concerning the first difference of their factor complexity and the second concerning their asymptotic critical exponent. In this talk, we will prove both conjectures by studying bispecial factors within those words. We will highlight a method by K.Klouda allowing us to fully list those bispecial factors and show how this list allows us to attack the conjectures in question. | + | |
| - | Joint work with L' | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | **February 3 2026: Annika Huch ** | + | |
| - | **February 17 2026: Steven Robertson** | ||
| **March 03 2026: Ingrid Vukusic** | **March 03 2026: Ingrid Vukusic** | ||
| Line 48: | Line 42: | ||
| **May 26 2026: Reem Yassawi** | **May 26 2026: Reem Yassawi** | ||
| + | |||
| + | **July 7 2026: Delaram Moradi** | ||
| ==== Past talks 2026 ==== | ==== Past talks 2026 ==== | ||
| - | **January 6 2026: Louis Marin** //Maximal 2-dimensional binary words of bounded degree// | ||
| - | (Authors: Alexandre Blondin Massé, Alain Goupil, Raphael L' | + | **February 3 2026: [[https:// |
| - | {{ seminar2026: | + | {{ seminar2026: |
| - | {{ seminar2026: | + | {{ seminar2026: |
| + | The reconstruction problem concerns the ability to uniquely determine an unknown word from querying information on the number of occurrences of chosen subwords. In the joined work with M. Golafshan and M. Rigo we focused on the reconstruction problem when the unknown word belongs to a known polynomial regular language, i.e., | ||
| + | its growth function is bounded by a polynomial. Exploiting the combinatorial and structural properties of these languages, we are able to translate queries into polynomial equations and transfer the problem of unique reconstruction to finding those sets of queries such that their polynomial equations have a unique integer solution. | ||
| - | Let $d$ be an integer between $0$ and $4$, and $W$ be a $2$-dimensional word of dimensions $h \times w$ on the binary alphabet $\{0, 1\}$, where $h, w \in \mathbb Z > 0$. Assume that each occurrence of the letter $1$ in $W$ is adjacent to at most $d$ letters $1$. We provide an exact formula for the maximum number of letters $1$ that can occur in $W$ for fixed $(h, w)$. As a byproduct, we deduce an upper bound on the length of maximum snake polyominoes contained in a $h \times w$ rectangle. | ||
| + | **January 20 2026: [[https:// | ||
| - | ==== Past talks 2025 ==== | + | {{ seminar2026: |
| - | ** December 9 2025: [[https:// | + | {{ seminar2026:20260120kreczman.mp4 |video of the talk}} |
| - | {{ seminar2025: | + | The Thue-Morse, Fibonacci-Thue-Morse and Allouche-Johnson words are related to the binary, Zeckendorf and Narayana numeration systems respectively, |
| - | {{ seminar2025: | + | In a recent preprint, J.Shallit put forth two conjectures on words of this family, |
| + | Joint work with L' | ||
| + | **January 6 2026: Louis Marin** //Maximal 2-dimensional binary words of bounded degree// | ||
| - | It is well-known that checking whether a given string $w$ matches a given regular expression $r$ can be done in quadratic time $O(|w|⋅ |r|)$ and that this cannot be improved to a truly subquadratic running time of $O((|w|⋅ |r|)^{1-\varepsilon})$ assuming the strong exponential time hypothesis (SETH). We study a different matching paradigm where we ask instead whether $w$ has a subsequence that matches $r$, and show that regex matching in this sense can be solved in linear time $O(|w| + |r|)$. Further, the same holds if we ask for a supersequence. We show that the quantitative variants where we want to compute a longest or shortest subsequence or supersequence of w that matches $r$ can be solved in $O(|w|⋅ |r|)$, i. e., asymptotically no worse than classical regex matching; and we show that $O(|w| + |r|)$ is conditionally not possible for these problems. We also investigate these questions with respect to other natural string relations like the infix, prefix, left-extension or extension relation instead of the subsequence and supersequence relation. We further study the complexity of the universal problem where we ask if all subsequences (or supersequences, infixes, prefixes, left-extensions or extensions) of an input string satisfy a given regular expression. | + | (Authors: Alexandre Blondin Massé, Alain Goupil, Raphael L' |
| - | This is based on the paper: Antoine Amarilli, Florin Manea, Tina Ringleb, Markus L. Schmid: Linear Time Subsequence and Supersequence Regex Matching. MFCS 2025: 9:1-9:19 | + | {{ seminar2026:20260106marin.pdf |slides}} |
| + | {{ seminar2026: | ||
| - | **November 25 2025: [[https:// | ||
| - | |||
| - | {{ seminar2025: | ||
| - | |||
| - | {{ seminar2025: | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | A shuffler is a 3-tape transducer specialized in the shuffling of words. These automata define rational sets in the so-called shuffling monoid, which map directly to regular shuffle languages. In this talk we look at rational relations of words and wonder whether their full shuffle is rational: we conclude that it's very rare that the full shuffle of a rational relation remains rational but find very interesting examples where rationality can be assured. | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | **November 11 2025: [[https:// | ||
| - | |||
| - | {{ seminar2025: | ||
| - | |||
| - | {{ seminar2025: | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | A very common problem type in combinatorics on words is to construct words (under constraints) that avoid repetition. This is often done by constructing suitable morphisms. | ||
| - | Here we flip the setup: we ask how good morphisms are at introducing repetitions into words. Periodic morphisms are trivially very good at this, but how about less trivial classes of morphisms? | ||
| - | |||
| - | We consider a few variations of this question. We characterize finite words that do not have an upper bound on fractional or integer exponents when mapped via injective morphisms. Then we consider the asymptotic critical exponent of infinite words. While we consider all finite alphabet sizes, these variations are better understood in the binary case. | ||
| - | This talk is an extended version of the one presented at DLT 2025. It is based on joint work with Eva Foster and Aleksi Saarela, and on ongoing research. | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | **October 14 2025: [[https:// | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | {{ seminar2025: | ||
| - | |||
| - | {{ seminar2025: | ||
| - | |||
| - | This presentation is concerned with hypercubic billiards with irrational trajectories. In this talk, I will present the relationship between balance properties in hypercubic billiards, and subshift cohomology. | ||
| - | |||
| - | More precisely, I will define cohomology for subshifts and (time permitting) illustrate with examples of how cohomology has previously been used in symbolic dynamics. Then, I will present the link between cohomology and balance for billiard sequences. Finally, I will explain how results of Kellendonk and Sadun on the dimension of some cohomology spaces implies that billiard words in cubes of dimension at least 3 cannot be balanced on all factors. | ||
| - | |||
| - | In the case of billiards in the cube, we also showed (using other methods) that these sequences are not balanced on factors of length 2. | ||
| - | |||
| - | Joint work with Nicolas Bédaride and Valérie Berthé. | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | **September 16 2025: Kaisei Kishi** //Net Occurrences in Fibonacci and Thue-Morse Words// | ||
| - | |||
| - | {{ seminar2025: | ||
| - | |||
| - | {{ seminar2025: | ||
| - | |||
| - | In a string $T$, an occurrence of a substring $S=T[i ... j]$ is a net occurrence if $S$ is repeated in $T$, while both left extension $T[i-1, ... j]$ and right extension $T[i, ... j+1]$ are unique in $T$. The number of net occurrences of $S$ in $T$ is called its net frequency. Compared with ordinary frequency, net frequency highlights the more significant occurrences of $S$ in $T$. In this talk, I will present several properties of net occurrences and describe techniques to identify all the net occurrences in Fibonacci and Thue-Morse words. In particular, I will explain the technique to characterize the occurrences of smaller-order Fibonacci and Thue-Morse words. This is a joint work with Peaker Guo. | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | **September 2 2025: Gandhar Joshi** // | ||
| - | |||
| - | {{ seminar2025: | ||
| - | |||
| - | {{ seminar2025: | ||
| - | |||
| - | This is joint work with Dan Rust. We define Monochromatic arithmetic progression (MAP) as the repetition of a symbol (traditionally colour) with a constant difference in a sequence. We study thresholds of the lengths of MAPs in the Fibonacci word in our paper https:// | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | **July 15 2025: [[https:// | ||
| - | |||
| - | {{ seminar2025: | ||
| - | |||
| - | {{ seminar2025: | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | We study automatic sequences and automatic systems (symbolic dynamical systems) generated by general constant length (nonprimitive) substitutions. While an automatic system is typically uncountable, | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | **June 17 2025: [[https:// | ||
| - | |||
| - | {{ seminar2025: | ||
| - | |||
| - | {{ seminar2025: | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | One way to study the distribution of nested quadratic number fields satisfying fixed arithmetic relationships is through the evolution of continued fraction expansions. In the function field setting, it was shown by de Mathan and Teullie that given a quadratic irrational $\Theta$, the degrees of the periodic part of the continued fraction of $t^n\Theta$ are unbounded. Paulin and Shapira improved this by proving that quadratic irrationals exhibit partial escape of mass. Moreover, they conjectured that they must exhibit full escape of mass. We construct counterexamples to their conjecture in every characteristic. In this talk we shall discuss the technique of proof as well as the connection between escape of mass in continued fractions, Hecke trees, and number walls. This is part of joint works with Erez Nesharim and Uri Shapira and with Steven Robertson. | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | **June 3 2025: [[https:// | ||
| - | |||
| - | Automated reasoning tools have been effectively used to solve a variety of problems in discrete mathematics. | ||
| - | |||
| - | {{ seminar2025: | ||
| - | |||
| - | {{ seminar2025: | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | **May 20 2025: [[https:// | ||
| - | |||
| - | {{ seminar2025: | ||
| - | |||
| - | {{ seminar2025: | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | Let $w$ be a finite word over the alphabet $\{0,1\}$. For any natural number $n$, let $s_w(n)$ denote the number of occurrences of $w$ in the binary expansion of $n$ as a scattered subsequence. The talk aims to provide a systematic way of studying the growth of the partial sum $\sum_{n=0}^N (-1)^{s_w(n)}$ as $N \to \infty$. In particular, these techniques yield several classes of words $w$ with $\sum_{n=0}^N (-1)^{s_w(n)} = O(N^{1-\epsilon})$ for some $\epsilon >0$. We begin by motivating the ideas using the case of $w=01,011$. The talk is based on joint work with Shuo Li. | ||
| - | |||
| - | **May 6 2025: Jarkko Peltomäki** //The repetition threshold for ternary rich words// | ||
| - | |||
| - | {{ seminar2025: | ||
| - | |||
| - | {{ seminar2025: | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | In the recent years, it has been popular to determine the least critical exponent in specific families of infinite words. In this talk, I will explain what is known about the least critical exponents for infinite words that are rich in palindromes. In particular, I will outline the proof of our result that the least critical exponent for ternary rich infinite words equals $1 + 1/(3 - \mu) \approx 2.25876324$, | ||
| - | |||
| - | Joint work with L. Mol and J. D. Currie. | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | **April 22 2025: [[https:// | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | {{ seminar2025: | ||
| - | |||
| - | Given an infinite word $w$, its complexity function $p_w(n)$ counts the number of distinct subwords of length $n$ it contains. A longstanding open problem in the combinatorics of infinite words is the {\it inverse problem}: describe which functions $f: \mathbb N \to \mathbb N$ arise as complexity functions of infinite words. Such functions must be non-decreasing and, unless eventually constant, strictly increasing; they must also be submultiplicative, | ||
| - | |||
| - | We resolve this problem up to asymptotic equivalence in the sense of large-scale geometry. Specifically, | ||
| - | |||
| - | Joint work with C. G. Moreira and E. Zelmanov. | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | **April 8 2025: [[https:// | ||
| - | one-sided shift spaces// | ||
| - | |||
| - | {{ seminar2025: | ||
| - | |||
| - | {{ seminar2025: | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | The Lagrange spectrum is related to the rational approximations of badly | ||
| - | approximable numbers. The discrete part of the spectrum is denoted in terms | ||
| - | of Christoffel words. A multiplicative analog of the Lagrange spectrum was | ||
| - | recently investigated, | ||
| - | the minimal limit points of certain multiplicative Markoff-Lagrange spectra in | ||
| - | terms of symbolic dynamical systems and certain substitutions. | ||
| - | |||
| - | In this talk, we study an analog of the Markoff-Lagrange spectrum for general | ||
| - | one-sided shift spaces. As our main results, we determine the discrete parts and | ||
| - | minimal limit points in terms of $S$-adic sequences, where $S$ is an infinite set of | ||
| - | substitutions. This is joint work with Wolfgang Steiner. | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | **March 25 2025: [[https:// | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | {{ seminar2025: | ||
| - | |||
| - | {{ seminar2025: | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | We study some properties of the growth rate of $L(A,F)$, that is, the language of words over the alphabet $A$ avoiding the set of forbidden factors $F$. We first provide a sufficient condition on $F$ and $A$ for the growth of $L(A,F)$ to be boundedly supermultiplicative. | ||
| - | We also apply our technique to the specific setting of power-free words where the argument can be slightly refined to provide better bounds. Finally, we apply a similar idea to $F$-free circular words and in particular we make progress toward a conjecture of Shur about the number of square-free circular words. | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | **March 11 2025: | ||
| - | |||
| - | {{ seminar2025: | ||
| - | |||
| - | Hofstadter' | ||
| - | $G(n)=n-G(G(n-1))$. Following Hofstadter, a family $(F_k)$ of similar | ||
| - | functions is obtained by varying the number $k$ of nested recursive calls | ||
| - | in this equation. We present here a few nice properties of these functions. | ||
| - | In particular, they can be described via some infinite morphic words | ||
| - | generalizing the Fibonacci word. This was crucial for proving that | ||
| - | this family is ordered pointwise: for all $k$ and $n$, $F_k(n) \le F_{k+1}(n)$. | ||
| - | Moreover, these functions have a simple behavior on well-chosen numerical | ||
| - | representations (Zeckendorf decompositions for some Fibonacci-like sequences). | ||
| - | Thanks to that, we were also able to estimate the discrepancies for these $F_k$, | ||
| - | i.e. the maximal distances between each $F_k$ and its linear equivalent. | ||
| - | This whole work was formally proved using the Coq proof assistant | ||
| - | (except for a beautiful fractal !) and we will give a gentle introduction | ||
| - | to this Coq development. | ||
| - | |||
| - | Joint work with Shuo Li (U. Winnipeg) and Wolfgang Steiner (IRIF, Paris). | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | **February 25 2025: [[https:// | ||
| - | |||
| - | {{ seminar2025: | ||
| - | |||
| - | {{ seminar2025: | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | Work in collaboration with Michał Dębski, Jarosław Grytczuk, Jakub Przybyło and Małgorzata Śleszyńska-Nowak. | ||
| - | |||
| - | If, in a given word $W$, each letter appears an even number of times, then $W$ can be split into two identical, disjoint subwords. For example, the word $\mathtt{hotshots}$ can be split into two $\mathtt{hots}$ by dividing the word exactly in the middle: $\mathtt{hots\, | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | **February 11 2025: [[https:// | ||
| - | |||
| - | {{ seminar2025: | ||
| - | |||
| - | {{ seminar2025: | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | The palindromic length of the finite word $v$ is equal to the minimal number of palindromes whose concatenation is equal to $v$. It was conjectured in 2013 that for every infinite aperiodic word $x$, the palindromic length of its factors is not bounded. | ||
| - | We prove this conjecture to be true. | ||
| - | |||
| - | Here is [[https:// | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | **January 28 2025: [[https:// | ||
| - | |||
| - | {{ seminar2025: | ||
| - | |||
| - | {{ seminar2025: | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | We construct an infinite additive 5-power-free rich word over $\{0,1\}$ and an infinite additive 4-power-free rich word over $\{0, | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | **January 14 2025: [[https:// | ||
| + | Let $d$ be an integer between $0$ and $4$, and $W$ be a $2$-dimensional word of dimensions $h \times w$ on the binary alphabet $\{0, 1\}$, where $h, w \in \mathbb Z > 0$. Assume that each occurrence of the letter $1$ in $W$ is adjacent to at most $d$ letters $1$. We provide an exact formula for the maximum number of letters $1$ that can occur in $W$ for fixed $(h, w)$. As a byproduct, we deduce an upper bound on the length of maximum snake polyominoes contained in a $h \times w$ rectangle. | ||
| - | {{ seminar2025: | ||
| - | Work in collaboration with Jeffrey Shallit. | ||
| - | 1. The set of Christoffel matrices (that is, Burrows-Wheeler matrices of Christoffel words) of size $n$ by $n$, where the alphabet is some commutative ring $R$, form a monoid under multiplication, | ||
| - | (this result was also obtained independently by Luca Zamboni) | ||
| - | 2. The determinant of a Christoffel matrix has a simple form, using the Zolotareff symbol (the latter extends the Jacobi symbol). | ||
| - | 3. Taking $n$ factors of length $n$ of a Sturmian sequence over $0$, $1$, one obtains a matrix and a determinant. There are$n+1$ such determinants; | + | ==== Archives 2025 ==== |
| + | The talks of 2025 are available [[2025|here]]. | ||