Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| start [2026/04/29 09:57] – anna.frid | start [2026/06/24 12:59] (current) – anna.frid | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
| ==== Upcoming talks ==== | ==== Upcoming talks ==== | ||
| - | **May 12 2026: Léo Vivion** | + | To be scheduled later |
| + | |||
| + | <del>**July 7 2026: Delaram Moradi**</ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Past talks 2026 ==== | ||
| + | **June 23 2026: [[https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{ seminar2026: | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{ seminar2026: | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | We define a transform $T$ on binary words. Given a binary word, we use the positions of its zeros and ones to build a new binary word. Applied to the alternating word $a_0 = 0101\ldots$, | ||
| - | **May 26 2026: Reem Yassawi** | ||
| **June 9 2026: [[https:// | **June 9 2026: [[https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{ seminar2026: | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{ seminar2026: | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| String attractor is an intensively studied object in Combinatorics on Words. | String attractor is an intensively studied object in Combinatorics on Words. | ||
| Line 34: | Line 52: | ||
| Simple Parry sequences have been recently studied from this point of view and (not necessarily minimal) attractors of their prefixes have been described and a conjecture that attractors of alphabet size should be sufficient was stated. We prove this conjecture. Moreover, we provide attractors of prefixes of some particular form of binary non-simple Parry sequences. | Simple Parry sequences have been recently studied from this point of view and (not necessarily minimal) attractors of their prefixes have been described and a conjecture that attractors of alphabet size should be sufficient was stated. We prove this conjecture. Moreover, we provide attractors of prefixes of some particular form of binary non-simple Parry sequences. | ||
| - | **June 23 2026: Benoit Clôitre** | ||
| - | **July 7 2026: Delaram Moradi** | + | **May 12 2026: [[https:// |
| + | |||
| + | {{ seminar2026: | ||
| + | |||
| + | (The talk was not recorded at the speaker' | ||
| + | |||
| + | In 2015, Rigo and Salimov introduced a family of complexities that forms a scale between abelian complexity and factor complexity: the $k$-binomial complexities. In particular, they showed that Sturmian words satisfy the following remarkable combinatorial property: their $2$-binomial complexity is equal to their factor complexity. Since then, the only other known example satisfying this property is the Tribonacci word. | ||
| + | |||
| + | In this talk, I will present some stability results for words whose $k$-binomial complexities coincide with their factor complexity, notably under letter deletion and a coloring operation. These stability properties allow to show that several well-known families of words also have their $2$-binomial complexity equal to their factor complexity. | ||
| - | ==== Past talks 2026 ==== | ||
| **April 28 2026: [[https:// | **April 28 2026: [[https:// | ||